About

Sean Gleeson

Sean Gleeson is an artist, teacher, and blogger who lives and works in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Navigate

Categories

Search

The other Gleeson blogs

Get ranted at

To put this gizmo on your own site, click the 'ABOUT' button, and do whatever it tells you.

The Gleeson Bloglomerate blog.gleeson.us
Sean Gleeson
FeeBeeGlee
Holy Family School



I remember news stories filed from Afghanistan before that nation’s historic foray into democracy, which reported encounters with Afghani citizens hoarding voter registration cards. These new voters were a bit unclear on the “one man, one vote” concept, and thought that since every voter needed a registration card, it must follow that each voter will be assigned as many votes as cards in his possession.

I’ve learned that a similar fallacy has taken hold among some voters in the 2004 Weblog Awards. I’ve read comments on two blogs from people who think that since voting requires a computer, it follows that each person may vote as many times per day as computers to which he has access.

Here’s one example I found: “Well, I do make the effort to vote both at work and at home. So, even if I don’t like ya, at least I support ya!”

And on another site, another: “I’m even voting from home AND from work just to help get your numbers up there. (all within the rules of one vote per day per computer)”

I need hardly point out that that is not what the rules say. The rules simply say,

You may vote once every 24 hours in each poll.

There’s no ambiguity. That’s ‘You,’ as in “you, the person casting the vote,” and ‘once,’ as in “not twice.”

(The respective owners of those blogs have not — yet — replied that their commenters are in error.)

I’m not bringing this up to rain down scorn onto these multiple electors, and certainly not to beg my own readers to duplicate their chicanery to “get even.” Just the opposite: I had assumed that everyone understood that voting on multiple machines to defeat the once-a-day rule is wrong, but I am evidently mistaken in that assumption. So I am writing to inform my own readers that it is wrong. Please do not do it, not even if you are voting for me. Especially not if you are voting for me.

And if you have already done this, please refrain from voting again until as many days elapse as instances of your infraction. If you have done it four or more times, please don’t vote again at all, since there are only four days of voting left.

I have no way of enforcing this plea for honesty, and no way of knowing who complies and who violates it. Only you, and the One who wrote the law on your heart, will know.

 

From my reading around the blogosphere, I gather the 2004 Weblog Awards seem to have been a conversation-starter between many bloggers and the voices in their heads. And these voices can be downright nasty!

BLOGGER: Why am I not winning this contest?
VOICE IN BLOGGER’S HEAD: Because you are inferior to other people.
BLOGGER: What do you mean, ‘inferior’?
VOICE: Inferior to. Lower than. Not as good as. Suck worse than.
BLOGGER: That’s not true! It’s because my work is not pitched to the lowest common denominator like that other guy’s, but rather is appreciated by a smaller body of readers who really understand me.
VOICE: So you’re James Joyce, and the other guy is Dean Koontz, is that it?
BLOGGER: Well…
VOICE: I think you could do with an emergency backup theory, just in case that one can be refuted.
BLOGGER: Okay, but the other guy works real hard. He must spend hours trying to think up posts that will appeal to people and get links. I just write what’s honestly in my heart.
VOICE: Could it be that the other guy writes what’s honestly in his heart too?
BLOGGER: Funny quips about celebrities who happen to be in that day’s news cycle are honestly in his heart? Is that what you’re asking?
VOICE: No, I’m asking, does working hard make the other guy less honest than you?
BLOGGER: Maybe not, but working that hard would make me less honest.
VOICE: Since you honestly don’t want to work that hard?
BLOGGER: Right. Not on my blog, at any rate.
VOICE: It’s not that you’re lazy…
BLOGGER: It’s not that I’m lazy, I just have priorities: things I work hard at, and things I don’t.
VOICE: And your blog is one of the things you don’t. You didn’t start writing a blog to add a burden to your life.
BLOGGER: Right! That’s not what it was ever meant to be.
VOICE: You write for yourself, and whoever likes it…
BLOGGER: And whoever likes it, that’s fine, and whoever doesn’t, that’s fine, too.
VOICE: You don’t care how popular you are.
BLOGGER: I don’t care how popular I am. What am I, in junior high school again?
VOICE: You’re not so insecure as to think that…
BLOGGER: …to think that winning some contest will…
VOICE: …or losing…
BLOGGER: …to think that winning or losing some contest will somehow validate my…
VOICE: …or invalidate…
BLOGGER: …or invalidate my worth as…
VOICE: …as a human being.
BLOGGER: I was going to say ‘writer.’
VOICE: Fine. You don’t care who wins the 2004 Weblog Awards.
BLOGGER: I don’t care, all that much, who wins.
VOICE: You don’t care who wins the 2004 Weblog Awards.
BLOGGER: Okay, I don’t care who wins the 2004 Weblog Awards.
VOICE: These are not the droids you’re looking for.
BLOGGER: These are… hey. Am I coming to these conclusions rationally, or are you leading me to them so I’ll feel better?
VOICE: That depends on whether I’m your superego or your id.
BLOGGER: Which are you?
VOICE: Which do you think?
BLOGGER: You’re my superego.
VOICE: Of course I am.

 

Santa I've been a good girl please stop

From engrish.com.

 


warez software
buy adobe cs5
penis size women
Santa Barbara Solutions